Dispute Resolution in Bisq 1 - Revision history

Pazza: /* Level 3: Arbitration */

2025-04-16T18:29:11Z

Level 3: Arbitration

SuddenWhipVapor: add reference to proof being asked in mediation

2025-03-08T15:23:19Z

add reference to proof being asked in mediation

Strayorigin: Strayorigin moved page Dispute resolution to Dispute Resolution in Bisq 1: page is appropriate for Bisq 1, references do not apply to Bisq 2, which should be a new page

2025-01-15T20:09:03Z

Strayorigin moved page Dispute resolution to Dispute Resolution in Bisq 1: page is appropriate for Bisq 1, references do not apply to Bisq 2, which should be a new page

Strayorigin: reworked most sections for clarity, provided more links to references, removed outdated info, grammar/spelling

2025-01-15T20:05:48Z

reworked most sections for clarity, provided more links to references, removed outdated info, grammar/spelling

Show changes

SuddenWhipVapor: /* Level 3: Arbitration */ remove reference to confiscation, as no confiscation properly happens, traders sign the DPT themselves at the start of the trade

2024-11-27T09:41:57Z

Level 3: Arbitration: remove reference to confiscation, as no confiscation properly happens, traders sign the DPT themselves at the start of the trade

Pazza: /* Where to communicate with mediators? */

2024-08-25T15:58:29Z

Where to communicate with mediators?

Pazza: /* Level 3: Arbitration */

2024-08-25T15:56:24Z

Level 3: Arbitration

Pazza at 15:54, 25 August 2024

2024-08-25T15:54:33Z

Pazza at 03:12, 31 December 2022

2022-12-31T03:12:34Z

Pazza at 02:31, 31 December 2022

2022-12-31T02:31:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 16 April 2025
Line 154:		Line 154:

	'''Remember, [[arbitration]] should be seen as a last resort. All efforts should be made for traders to come to an agreement with themselves or via the [[mediator]].'''		'''Remember, [[arbitration]] should be seen as a last resort. All efforts should be made for traders to come to an agreement with themselves or via the [[mediator]].'''
		+
		+	== How to find your arbitrator ?==
		+	Your arbitrator's name should be visible when you open a arbitration ticket. Look for it under the 'support agent' column.
		+
		+	If, however, you have a trade not in arbitration but would like to know your assigned arbitrator's name, please refer to [[Finding your arbitrator]].

	= If all else fails =		= If all else fails =

@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 === Trading Peer Expectations ===
-* Cooperate with the [[mediator]], providing requested information.
+* Cooperate with the [[mediator]], providing requested information (quality proof will be asked for payments or bank issues)
 * Respond to messages within 48 hours. Non-response might result in [[Table of penalties|penalties]].

@@ Line 158: / Line 158: @@
 {{Admonition_Note| Mediation is expected to be the optimal resolution for both traders. If the trade goes to arbitration the arbitrator will payout out the trade amount plus one peer's security deposit. This means the total arbitration payout will be less than the mediation payout. Both traders agreeing to the mediator's suggestion is the happy path. Requesting arbitration is meant for exceptional circumstances, such as one peer not responding, or if a trader is sure the mediator did not make a fair payout suggestion.
-'''This dynamic essentially makes bitcoin confiscatable, enabling a sort of mutually assured destruction to drive dispute resolution on Bisq without trusted third parties.'''
+'''This dynamic essentially enables a sort of mutually assured destruction to drive dispute resolution on Bisq without trusted third parties.'''
 }}

@@ Line 126: / Line 126: @@
 If you any reasons you are not able to communicate with the mediators in the Bisq app you can reach out to them on [https://bisq.chat Matrix].
-The mediators usernames on Matrix are:
+See here for more information on [[finding your mediator]].
 == How to find your mediators? ==

@@ Line 153: / Line 153: @@
-The [[Arbitration#Time-Locked_Payout_Transaction|time-locked transaction]] sends ''all'' funds in the multisig escrow (i.e., those of both trading peers) to a donation address.
+The [[Arbitration#Time-Locked_Payout_Transaction|time-locked transaction]] sends ''all'' funds in the multisig escrow (i.e., those of both trading peers) to the [[Burning Men]].
-* If the trade was created prior to 1st January 2023 the donation address used will be the [[Donation Address Holder|legacy burning man]] ([https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues/80 the owner of this address] is bonded and approved by DAO voting).
+The delayed payout transaction can only be published 10 days after the deposit transaction is confirmed (for altcoin trades) or 20 days after the deposit transaction is confirmed (for fiat trades).
 Think of this time-locked transaction as a "safeguard transaction" or a "fallback transaction"—it's a last-resort option to be exercised only if nothing else is working out.

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:09, 15 January 2025
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 25 August 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:


−	{{Admonition_Warn\|All trades placed from 1st January 2023 will use a new trade protocol that is designed to further improve the decentralization of Bisq. The new protocol is a result of the proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/390 Distribute Burningman role to contributors who burned BSQ] which was vote on in Bisq DAO cycle 41 with 100% approval.	+	{{Admonition_Warn\|All trades placed from 1st January 2023 will use a new trade protocol ([[Burning Men\|Burning Men Protocol]]) that is designed to further improve the decentralization of Bisq. The new protocol is a result of the proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/390 Distribute Burningman role to contributors who burned BSQ] which was vote on in Bisq DAO cycle 41 with 100% approval.

	The protocol change means trades placed from 1st January 2023 will have an important difference should the trade end in arbitration. This is as a result of the accepted proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/386 do not pay out the security deposit of the trade peer to the arbitration case winner].		The protocol change means trades placed from 1st January 2023 will have an important difference should the trade end in arbitration. This is as a result of the accepted proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/386 do not pay out the security deposit of the trade peer to the arbitration case winner].

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 * The arbitration 'loser' will not be be refunded their deposit partially or in full.
-This chance is necessary for the security of the new protocol.
+This change is necessary for the security of the new protocol.
 Remember arbitration should be seen as the last resort. All efforts should be made for trader to come to an agreement with themselves or via the mediator.}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 31 December 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:


−	{{Admonition_Warn\|~~BTC~~ All ~~trade~~ placed from 1st January 2023 will use a new trade protocol that is designed to further improve the decentralization of Bisq. The new protocol is a result of the proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/390 Distribute Burningman role to contributors who burned BSQ] which was vote on in Bisq DAO cycle 41 with 100% approval.	+	{{Admonition_Warn\|All trades placed from 1st January 2023 will use a new trade protocol that is designed to further improve the decentralization of Bisq. The new protocol is a result of the proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/390 Distribute Burningman role to contributors who burned BSQ] which was vote on in Bisq DAO cycle 41 with 100% approval.

	The protocol change means trades placed from 1st January 2023 will have an important difference should the trade end in arbitration. This is as a result of the accepted proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/386 do not pay out the security deposit of the trade peer to the arbitration case winner].		The protocol change means trades placed from 1st January 2023 will have an important difference should the trade end in arbitration. This is as a result of the accepted proposal [https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/386 do not pay out the security deposit of the trade peer to the arbitration case winner].